Exploit all available traction at each wheel. The dream pursued.
Anti-lock Braking System (ABS)
Engineers had dreamed about anti-lock brakes for at least 70 years
and a patent for a brake force controller was granted to Karl Wessel
in 1928 for a design which was never built. A few years later
fundamental work was performed by Robert Bosch and Fritz Osthaus.
Osthaus later joined ATE and was convinced that a brake can only work
well in a correctly designed chassis, so he invented several improvements
like the zero or negative steering roll radius and the thinking
rear axle among them, both of which are used on most cars today.
In 1961 a mechanical system acting on the center differential and
derived from Dunlop's Maxaret system used in aircraft was installed
in the Ferguson P66, and a complicated mechanical system similar
to the Jensen also on the 1968 Ford Continental Mark III.
Daimler-Benz had been monitoring mechanical systems since the
late 1950s and concluded in their own tests that these systems
were inadequate for road traffic, since they reduced brake
pressure evenly at all wheels.
The name ABS is derived from the word Antiblockiersystem.
Heinz Leiber worked on automobile ABS in 1964 at Teldix and
later at Daimler-Benz and is the father of the first working
automotive ABS system. An ABS prototype vehicle was shown
in 1970, and with ABS suitable for road vehicles, since it
could reduce the brake pressure at each wheel individually.
But it took many more years of development until the system
was reliable enough, using digital integrated circuits instead
of analog components.
"The anti-lock braking system - and with it Mercedes-Benz -
was also a pioneer in automotive digital electronics."
Heinz Leiber, then head of ABS development at Daimler-Benz
Bosch ABS 2S in 1981 Euro 500SEL
|
Mercedes-Benz started the first series production in 1978 with the ABS 2
system, as used in the legendary Euro '81 500SEL Mercedes-Benz.
ABS was optional for 2599.00 marks, about 5% of the car's price and would
be equivalent to a $5000 option today.
|
|
 Bosch
|
The sideways force drops off faster than the brake force
when the wheel slip increases. ABS keeps both close to optimum.
|
The idea behind ABS is simple: the braking-force coefficient and
braking effectiveness are highest with the tire at the
optimal brake slip. The controller modulates the brake pressure
to keep the wheel in the optimal zone. A locked wheel's coefficient
is about 10% lower than optimum, depending on the surface. Even more
important is the lateral, or sideways, force coefficient, since it
decreases to only about 10% of its full value when the wheel locks,
as shown in the plot from Bosch above.
Continental shows the ABS control sequence plotting the speed and
brake pressure versus time. The brake pressure
increases, then the increase stops, then decreases, then increases
again as the wheel speeds up again, and is thus modulated around the optimum
to keep the wheel turning during braking which retains steerability.
Cars cannot be steered with locked wheels.
ABS' major contribution is thus the lateral adhesion which allows
steering during braking and, depending on the road surface, usually
a reduced stopping distance as well.
|
Mercedes-Benz
|
Locked front wheels lost sideways force and the car without
ABS pushes out of the curve.
|
ABS systems do not necessarily exploit all available traction. In
2-channel systems only the wheel speed at one front wheel is sensed
which often locks up or under-brakes the other front wheel.
In 3-channel and 4-channel systems, with rear brakes on different
diagonal circuits, the rear wheels are low-value-tied where the
modulation is based on the rear wheel with the lower adhesion.
This is done for better stability, since the overriding goal is
stable vehicle dynamics. Read on.
Mercedes Actros on mµ-split test surface
photo Continental AG
Tesla tested the 4 channel ABS of their new all electric roadster
on the mµ-split surface at the Continental Teves proving ground in
Arvidsjaur in Sweden. Movies are on their site.
http://www.teslamotors.com/design/safety.php
Even basic ABS requires something called GMA (Gier Moment
Anstiegsverzögerung; yaw moment increase delay) in vehicles with
short wheelbases, so that these smaller vehicles won't spin if left
and right wheels are braked hard on mµ-split surfaces, for
example both left wheels on asphalt and both right wheels on a gravel
shoulder. GMA delays the brake pressure increase
on the wheels with higher traction by a fraction of a second, so that
the driver can respond to a braking-induced turning/yawing motion -
like in long wheelbase vehicles.
GMA is turned off in curves when the lateral acceleration exceeds
about 0.4 g, since it tends to cause over-steering. Although GMA
is a passive system which is only used during ABS modulation, it
may have inspired ESP and ABS Plus.
Mercedes-Benz |
Large steering axle inclination results in zero or negative
steering roll radius and high tracking stability. Shown is the front axle
on top and the rear axle on the bottom, with a similar geometry.
Codesigned with ZF and Bishop Pty.
|
Mechanical ESP
Even better would be an optimised suspension design, which helps the driver to
steer when encountering uneven deceleration. Fritz Ostwald invented
the zero or negative steering roll radius to accomplish
this feat and patented it in 1958. The steering axle intersects the ground
slightly outside of the wheel center in the ML, a slightly zero or negative
steering roll radius.
If one wheel is braked more than the other, it will turn slightly more
towards the vehicle center, creating a very small steering correction
away from the side with the harder braked wheel/s. This is a stabilizing
moment, since the motion counters the vehicle yaw moment, caused by the
higher deceleration on the side of the vehicle with higher traction. This
geometry thus contributes to well behaved vehicle dynamics; long before
electronic systems became available. And note that this
stabilization works best on the steered axle. We have uncovered one
reason why Mercedes prefers low-value-tied rear axle ABS.
The ML rear axle also uses a double wishbone suspension, just like the
front, and the toe-in decreases under hard braking, which leads to
great tracking stability on the rear as well, but it won't correct the
vehicle direction as well as the front can, when decelerated unevenly,
for example due to a failed brake, uneven tire traction or tire
blowout. Double wishbone suspension first appeared on the Mercedes
model 380 in 1933.
To test an ABS system ,
I brake hard so the pedal starts pulsating. If one can't feel the
pulses, one can use a slightly higher initial speed. The pulsating
frequency depends on the road
surface and also the version of the ABS system. On slippery
surfaces like wet asphalt the onset is earlier. One can also test
the GMA delay when braking hard on split traction surfaces. I use
loose sand or gravel which covers the right side of the road and can
be found near windy beaches. One
needs to correct the induced yaw with the steering wheel, less so in
larger cars and less in cars with a zero or negative steering roll radius,
which are autocorrecting. To feel a non-ABS
brake in comparison, use an older car.
Full braking without ABS leads to flat spots on the tires, so
don't repeat it too often. If the tires flutter afterwards, have them
re-balanced, which helps, although the flat spot remains.
I use a light colored asphalt road for full-force brake tests. The
tires do scrub, but usually do not leave black tracks on the road when
viewed directly from above, unless the wheel locked up completely.
However when glancing at the test section from afar at a very low
angle, one can see black tire tracks on a light colored road surface;
even with correctly working ABS systems.
NASA Tire Hydroplaning movies
As an example, the tire adhesion coefficient on
a wet road at 60 MPH is about 0.5 and drops to zero when encountering
a puddle of water, just 3 mm deep.
Off-road ABS
Some off-roaders turn ABS off to improve braking, for example by
removing the ABS fuse. Is this reasonable? Not on hard surfaces. But on
surfaces with moveable material, e.g. snow, gravel, lose dirt, a locked
wheel can build a wedge in front of it and thus increase grip and reduce
stopping distances. A typical traction coefficient on a lose surface,
with ABS modulated wheels, is 0.2 and it can rise up to 0.3 with complete
lock.
How does the M-Class off-road ABS program work?
On road surfaces with good traction it works in the same manner
as Mercedes passenger cars. But when off-road in low range, the ML
can change into an off-road ABS mode if it detects rough road conditions
by sensing uneven wheel rotation and the speed is below 30 km/h - 18.5 MPH.
The brake apply phase is lengthened so the front wheels can "dig in".
At higher speeds the off-road situation is also monitored, but it wont
change into the off-road ABS mode until the speed drops below the limit.
Australian off-road ABS mode
Australian gravel roads turned out to
be so smooth that the system would not reliably detect offroad conditions
from jerky wheel motions. So in 2004 Bosch engineers in Australia developed
a new optional algorithm especially for these conditions. Wheel slip is
allowed to lengthen from the usual 10% to 40% on gravel, also depending on
whether the car is in a curve.
Why didn't ABS work when I slowly slid down my plowed driveway?
ABS doesn't work under 5 MPH / 8 km/h and allows wheel lock,
similar to the off-road ABS mode.
Does ABS work when driving backwards? Yes.
Does ABS reduce accidents?
According to a 1994 NHTSA study frontal multi vehicle impacts
in 1990 to 1992 on wet, dry, snowy and icy surfaces are reduced
9% with ABS. Quite a bit of discussion ensued about fatal accidents:
while fatalities on wet roads were reduced 24%, on icy, snowy roads
13% and fatalities of crashed into pedestrians, bicyclists, trains
and animals 27%, fatal run-off-road crashes increased 28% when ABS was
introduced, thus resulting in no significant overall change in fatalities.
Further studies in 2000 to 2002 found the increase in run-off-road
fatal crashes in the first 2 years after ABS was introduced to be
temporary and they may have been due to driver inexperience. One study
in 2002 could attribute the effect to drunken drivers who jerk the
steering wheel violently in panic situations. To conclude although ABS may
have no significant or only small effect on fatalities, its overall
safety benefits of reducing accidents were confirmed.
ABS takes 26 years from innovation to standard
ABS becomes a standard option on all European cars starting in July
2004. The agreement was signed in 2001 and thus applies to the 15 European
nations before the eastern expansion. Japanese and Korean automobile
manufacturer associations signed similar agreements.
Bosch reaches 150 million brake controller milestone
Bosch made 150 million brake controllers since ABS was first introduced
30 years ago on the Mercedes-Benz S-Class. Currently the controllers
are produced in six plants worldwide and a new plant in Brazil is to
open in 2007.
Braking with and without ABS Plus. Pictures Continental AG
ABS Plus
works just like ABS and uses the same hardware, but employs more advanced
software algorithms. It's a relatively recent invention. The purpose is
to assist the driver in extremely dynamic situations, by selectively
reducing the brake pressure on one or more wheels. From the wheel speed
sensors it senses the
vehicle dynamics, for example if the vehicle is in a curve, is
under- or oversteering, leaning etc and then optimises the braking
pressure for each wheel accordingly. It can brake wheels individually.
For example, second generation ESP systems, like in the ML, brake the
inner rear wheel in a curve less than the outer rear wheel, helping the
alignment and reducing the need for ESP intervention. Like ABS it only
works during braking, in contrast to active systems like ASR, ESP or SBC
and mainly improves the tracking stability and steerability, even during
fast avoidance manoeuvers.
Electronic Brake Proportioning (EBP)
Electronic Brake Force Distribution
Elektronische Bremskraft Verteilung (EBV)
dynamically adjusts the hydraulic pressure supplied to the rear
wheels during braking. Compared to more conventional methods, e.g. a
fixed ratio valve, it thus enhances braking effectiveness by
allowing the rear brakes to supply a greater proportion of the
braking effort without a loss of vehicle stability. During braking,
EBP senses if both rear wheels are tending to lock in equal amounts
by comparing the sensed wheel speeds on the rear and front wheels,
and limits or reduces the brake pressure to the rear wheels.
This ensures proper brake proportioning for differing vehicle
loads and maneuvering conditions. It also promotes increased brake
pad life. The controller is a MK20e instead of the normal MK20
and also requires different, more sensitive DC wheel speed sensors.
Bosch plot
When braking, weight transfers from the rear to the front wheels.
Applying equal braking pressures at all wheels would cause the rear wheels
to lock first with high brake force, at high deceleration. Older systems
use fixed values, based on pressure or load dependant ratio valves to
reduce the pressures on the rear axles in this case. EBP works much more
precisely and differentiated, automatically
adjusting for total weight, transfered weight, center of gravity height,
and even whether the vehicle is in a curve or straight line, thus
exploiting all available traction for braking while at the same time
ensuring vehicle stability.
Original press release announcing 1999 Mercedes M-Class with EBV
Regarding lifting of the vehicle. Continental put out a press release
around 1999 showing why it is advantageous to
have EBV in a lifted vehicle. Since it automatically adjusts to the
higher center of gravity. In vehicles without EBV folks often tend to
forget to adjust the fixed brake force proportioning valve when lifting
it (according to ATE), so that the rears might lock up first under hard
braking (unstable).
lifted M-Class
Continental shows a plot of the ideal brake force distribution
between front and rear axle, for a vehicle with driver only, and
a fully loaded vehicle. As the front brake force increases the
rear increases faster, but then drops off to prevent the rear wheels
from locking under heavy braking. In some cases this ideal brake
force distribution may lead to more brake pad wear on the rear than
the front axle, when, for example, a driver frequently brakes with
5 bar on the front which will apply 11 to 15 bar on the rears.
Whereas a driver usually applying 15 or more bar of pressure
to the fronts might wear the front pads faster.
|
Brake Energy Regeneration Introduced
Brake energy regeneration via
intelligent alternator control became standard on the new BMW
1-series and new BMW 5-series. The intelligent alternator mainly
charges the battery during braking and overrun conditions, and
disconnects when accelerating, enhancing power and agility.
Continental depicts the acceleration advantage with controlled
generator (blue curve) for a 1.6 liter gasoline direct
injection engine.
Mar 13, 2007
|
continue to 4x4 4MATIC 4ETS
created in 1998 and updated from time to time
|
Control. Unlike any other.
|
Wolfgang's ML Page
|