|
The dream pursued.
Anti-lock Braking System (ABS)
In 1961 a mechanical system acting on the center differential and derived from Dunlop's Maxaret system used in aircraft was installed in the Ferguson P66, and a complicated mechanical system similar to the Jensen also on the 1968 Ford Continental Mark III. Daimler-Benz had been monitoring mechanical systems since the late 1950s and concluded in their own tests that these systems were inadequate for road traffic, since they reduced brake pressure evenly at all wheels. The name ABS is derived from the word Antiblockiersystem. Jürgen Paul at Mercedes-Benz and Heinz Leiber who worked on automobile ABS in 1964 at Teldix and later at Daimler-Benz are the inventors of the first working automotive ABS system. An ABS prototype vehicle was shown in 1970, and with ABS suitable for road vehicles, since it could reduce the brake pressure at each wheel individually. But it took many more years of development until the system was reliable enough, using digital integrated circuits instead of analog components. In 1981 Jürgen Paul at Mercedes-Benz and Heinz Leiber at Bosch were awarded the Prof. Ferdinand Porsche prize by Porsche and the TU Wien. was also a pioneer in automotive digital electronics." Heinz Leiber, then head of ABS development at Daimler-Benz
The idea behind ABS is simple: the braking-force coefficient and braking effectiveness are highest with the tire at the optimal brake slip. The controller modulates the brake pressure to keep the wheel in the optimal zone. A locked wheel's coefficient is about 10% lower than optimum, depending on the surface. Even more important is the lateral, or sideways, force coefficient, since it decreases to only about 10% of its full value when the wheel locks, as shown in the plot from Bosch above.
ABS' major contribution is thus the lateral adhesion which allows steering during braking and, depending on the road surface, usually a reduced stopping distance as well.
ABS systems do not necessarily exploit all available traction. In 2-channel systems only the wheel speed at one front wheel is sensed which often locks up or under-brakes the other front wheel. In 3-channel and 4-channel systems, with rear brakes on different diagonal circuits, the rear wheels are low-value-tied where the modulation is based on the rear wheel with the lower adhesion. This is done for better stability, since the overriding goal is stable vehicle dynamics. Read on.
Even basic ABS requires something called GMA (Gier Moment Anstiegsverzögerung; yaw moment increase delay) in vehicles with short wheelbases, so that these smaller vehicles won't spin if left and right wheels are braked hard on mµ-split surfaces, for example both left wheels on asphalt and both right wheels on a gravel shoulder. GMA delays the brake pressure increase on the wheels with higher traction by a fraction of a second, so that the driver can respond to a braking-induced turning/yawing motion - like in long wheelbase vehicles. GMA is turned off in curves when the lateral acceleration exceeds about 0.4 g, since it tends to cause over-steering. Although GMA is a passive system which is only used during ABS modulation, it may have inspired ESP and ABS Plus.
Even better would be an optimised suspension design, which helps the driver to steer when encountering uneven deceleration. Fritz Ostwald invented the zero or negative steering roll radius to accomplish this feat and patented it in 1958. The steering axle intersects the ground slightly outside of the wheel center in the ML, a slightly zero or negative steering roll radius. If one wheel is braked more than the other, it will turn slightly more towards the vehicle center, creating a very small steering correction away from the side with the harder braked wheel/s. This is a stabilizing moment, since the motion counters the vehicle yaw moment, caused by the higher deceleration on the side of the vehicle with higher traction. This geometry thus contributes to well behaved vehicle dynamics; long before electronic systems became available. And note that this stabilization works best on the steered axle. We have uncovered one reason why Mercedes prefers low-value-tied rear axle ABS. The ML rear axle also uses a double wishbone suspension, just like the front, and the toe-in decreases under hard braking, which leads to great tracking stability on the rear as well, but it won't correct the vehicle direction as well as the front can, when decelerated unevenly, for example due to a failed brake, uneven tire traction or tire blowout. Double wishbone suspension first appeared on the Mercedes model 380 in 1933. To test an ABS system , I brake hard so the pedal starts pulsating. If one can't feel the pulses, one can use a slightly higher initial speed. The pulsating frequency depends on the road surface and also the version of the ABS system. On slippery surfaces like wet asphalt the onset is earlier. One can also test the GMA delay when braking hard on split traction surfaces. I use loose sand or gravel which covers the right side of the road and can be found near windy beaches. One needs to correct the induced yaw with the steering wheel, less so in larger cars and less in cars with a zero or negative steering roll radius, which are autocorrecting. To feel a non-ABS brake in comparison, use an older car. Full braking without ABS leads to flat spots on the tires, so don't repeat it too often. If the tires flutter afterwards, have them re-balanced, which helps, although the flat spot remains. I use a light colored asphalt road for full-force brake tests. The tires do scrub, but usually do not leave black tracks on the road when viewed directly from above, unless the wheel locked up completely. However when glancing at the test section from afar at a very low angle, one can see black tire tracks on a light colored road surface; even with correctly working ABS systems.
NASA Tire Hydroplaning movies
Off-road ABS
How does the M-Class off-road ABS program work?
Australian off-road ABS mode
Why didn't ABS work when I slowly slid down my plowed driveway?
Does ABS work when driving backwards? Yes.
Does ABS reduce accidents?
ABS takes 26 years from innovation to standard
Bosch reaches 150 million brake controller milestone
ABS Plus
Electronic Brake Proportioning (EBP)
When braking, weight transfers from the rear to the front wheels.
Applying equal braking pressures at all wheels would cause the rear wheels
to lock first with high brake force, at high deceleration. Older systems
use fixed values, based on pressure or load dependant ratio valves to
reduce the pressures on the rear axles in this case. EBP works much more
precisely and differentiated, automatically
adjusting for total weight, transfered weight, center of gravity height,
and even whether the vehicle is in a curve or straight line, thus
exploiting all available traction for braking while at the same time
ensuring vehicle stability.
Regarding lifting of the vehicle. Continental put out a press release
around 1999 showing why it is advantageous to
have EBV in a lifted vehicle. Since it automatically adjusts to the
higher center of gravity. In vehicles without EBV folks often tend to
forget to adjust the fixed brake force proportioning valve when lifting
it (according to ATE), so that the rears might lock up first under hard
braking (unstable).
continue to 4x4 4MATIC 4ETS
created in 1998 and updated from time to time
|